Recruiting
and selecting staff
Selecting
people who are right for the job is notoriously difficult. The average
selection interview is regarded as of fairly low reliability.
Choosing
appropriate additional tools, to identify specific skills or aptitudes,
or potential for senior posts, or to pick out important issues to address
in a subsequent interview, can significantly improve reliability when
combined with other methods, and is an important aspect of our work.
Research
has suggested the following scale of reliability of different selection
methods:
(100%=
completely reliable)
| Promotion
assessment centres |
65% |
| Work
sample tests |
58%
|
| Ability
tests |
55% |
| Performance
assessment centres |
44% |
| Personality
questionnaires |
40% |
| Structured
interviews |
32% |
| Typical
interviews |
15% |
| References |
12% |
| Astrology,
graphology |
1% |
We
can help businesses identify the right tools, deliver them and undertake
scoring, feedback and interpretation to clients and candidates.
